« Why Pat McCrory Lost and What It Means in Trump's America | Main | »

December 09, 2016


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


campaign is over, polling should sample from the opinions of ALL Americans, not just Trump supporters.


Many Trump supporters hate Hillary so much, and believe just about everything negative written about her no matter how rediculous, that they don't realize how ignorant, naive, ill prepared and deeply egocentric Trump is.



I've been saying for years that something needs to be done with the media "outlets" that play fast and loose with the truth - from Fox to Breitbart, Drudge, WND, Infowars. LifeSiteNews, etc.

I bumped into a casual acquaintance prior to the election. She was bemoaning the terrible conditions under Obama: unemployment was soaring, the economy was far worse than under Bush, pssstttt....of course... Obama shouldn't even be President. Then there was Clinton who had personally authorized a number of assassinations of her political rivals!

This woman also made it clear that whites were being persecuted under Obama "the Muslim traitor". Tragically, this wasn't stuff she made up! She was taking this straight from Breitbart. If I were repeating this just for the sake of conversation, it would be anecdotal. But this poll is direct evidence that we have a serious problem in this country that can't be left unaddressed.

It has been said that without a free and independent press no democracy can survive. The press had long been given special privileges in recognition of its fiduciary duty to the public. Organizations that serve the far right are about as dedicated to the truth as Burger King is dedicated to fighting obesity. There is absolutely no incentive for outlets with a political axe to grind to stick to facts when their base is so reactionary and ignorant.

Correcting this problem became critical to the survival of this nation once a demagogue announced his intention to run for office. His election can be attributed directly to the misinformation and "fake news" being fed to certain members of the public on a 24/7/365 basis.

As I'm not a First Amendment specialist, I'm don't know what actions are appropriate. It is long past time to address this; something should have been done BEFORE Trump prevailed. However, the country was ripe for the appearance of an authoritarian leader who would whip up our basest emotions while claiming he had all the answers. The sane among us pretended that Fox's preposterous spins really weren't a problem. As to the "normalization of Breitbart" - that entity didn't even merit mention until a Breitbart "news" "reporter" had problems at a Trump event. Breitbart, known for its white supremacist leanings, was then being referred to as "news" and its employees are referred to as "reporters" by credible journalists! And now Steph Bannon, a man that would more appropriately be an inpatient in a mental health facility, is being given power he never should have access to. Not in a decent and ethical world.

This is the down side of tolerance. Those who need to be called out will end up destroying the very liberties we all take for granted. We're stuck with the aftermath. We'll be lucky to preserve SOME of the fundamental liberties we've come to enjoy.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader