« Michiganders Support More LGBT Protections | Main | McCrory Approval Hits New Low »

July 08, 2015


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


As a conservative, I have found your polls to be the most accurate over the last few years. You guys nailed the 2012 election and did incredibly well on the 2014 election as well.

Here you have Scott Walker and Mike Huckabee leading Clinton by 4, yet CNN had a national poll showing her leading every major GOP candidate by double digits.

To me, it suggests the CNN poll is a outlier / inaccurate, because there is no way Scott Walker leads Hillary by 4 in NC, yet trails her nationally by 15 points plus.

Any thoughts?


Thanks for the poll. The numbers that caught my eye: Sanders loses to Scott Walker by 8, and Clinton loses the same matchup by 4. Not great for either, but also not so bad against the strongest performing Republican in a red-leaning state. Among the more interesting tidbits: Since PPP's last North Carolina poll in late May, Sanders has gained two points in a head-to-head contest with Walker, while Clinton has lost four. And consider this: In the Sanders-Walker matchup, 23% of 2012 Obama voters are undecided, while only 15% of 2012 Romney voters remain undecided. In the Clinton-Walker matchup, there are fewer undecided voters, and among those the Romney voters outnumber Obama voters 3 to 1. This suggests Sanders has more room to grow in a general election than Clinton.

Clinton has a -16% net favorability among North Carolina voters, while Sanders has the highest favorability rating of all the Democrats running at -3%. Sanders' favorability has improved from -7 in the May poll, while Clinton's has dropped a point from -15. Perhaps most surprisingly, given Sanders' left-wing image, Sanders scores much stronger favorability numbers than Clinton among Independents and Republicans.


Your poll has a number of flaws, the biggest by far is:

1. Methodological. Party affiliation is self assessed, rather than determined through a series of questions, which is more accurate.
I know that it might take longer, but if you design 30 questions about the issues, you get a more accurate finding of whether people are progressive or conservative.
You should let people agree or disagree with 30 statements on a 5-point scale, For example:
"Rich people should pay a higher percentage of taxes than poor people"
agree strongly, agree somewhat, middle, agree somewhat, disagree strongly

If you do that, it might avoid bizarre results like Clinton trailing Walker by only FOUR points in state that self describes as 88 (EIGHTY EIGHT!!!) percent conservative.

2. The huge difference in internet vs phone results, page 62. Maybe not an outright flaw, but it is bizarre:
Hillary Clinton trails 41/52 with phone respondents, but LEADS him 52/25 with internet respondents???? Then how do you weigh phone v internet?

3. Your wording in the summary:
"Despite his success, Trump still trails Hillary Clinton among all voters, 47/44. Other Republican candidates have surpassed Clinton since the last PPP poll in North Carolina on June 4th."
It's unclear whether your talking about NC voters or all Americans. I'd assume just NC voters, but your wording made it unclear.

The last one is connected to the first flaw, obviously.


If we're trying to ferret out people's likely voting habits, why don't we ask about them? Instead of simply asking people to self-identify, it's arguably better to ask them what they voted in the last presidential, governor, senatorial and congress elections. Last 4 presidentials and senatorial, last 10 congressionals. Also ask if the candidate is conservative or a liberal, WITH NO OPTION FOR MODERATE otherwise you will get moderate bias. (everybody is in the middle class if you ask them)

I know for myself, if you asked me to self-identify with a political party, I'd decline to. If you asked me which party I historically have voted for, and am more likely to vote for in the future, I'd be identified as 99% Democrat.


another good way to suss out party affiliation is to ask them what they voted before. I suggest the previous 4 presidentials, senate and previous 10 or 8 congressionals.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2016

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader
Email Sign up: New Polling Data email