« | Main | General Election Presidential Matches Close; America Pulling for Spartans »

December 18, 2015


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


You know, I'm fine if people don't know what Agrabah is. We can't all keep up with every work of fiction in the world, even a relatively old and popular one. And we especially can't necessarily keep up with the names of all the characters and places in every work of fiction we encounter. But for the love of GOD, don't say you support bombing a place you clearly don't know anything about. You've proven yourself to be both a warmonger and an imbecile at that point.


What were the options on the "bomb Agrabah" question?
Was it just Yes/No?
Was it Yes/No/Don't Know?

just trying to figure out how the question was presented... thanks!


30% of GOP supporters support bombing a fictional country, and 13% opposed, meaning 43% of GOP supporters were duped by this question. However 36% of Democrats opposed bombing a fictional country, and 19% supported it, meaning 55% of these people didn't know they were being duped.

Your article intimates this means GOP Trump supporters are ignorant of geography and blood thirsty. In fact by 55-43% it is Democrats who were ignorant. This is consistent with Harvard studies that showed Conservatives scored higher on questioning about geography than Liberals did. In fact they scored higher with questioning about math, science, history, economics, and geography by about the same margin, (27.9% better).

This poll, meant to 'demonstrate' how stupid Trump supporters are actually shows the opposite is true.


It has become now necessary to Face the Fact that Trump needs to be accepted. All those with less than 7 % in a population of 500 or mor must drop out; so that the votes do not get fractured as is happening now.


Jeb Bush is so dumb ( "Dumb as a stone") that he did not understand why no other candidate is attacking Trump. Experience has shown all attackers have faded out(the last case is Jindal). The obstinate Trump supporters will spread the message and JB will go down further. "I am the only tough one to attack Trump" will not hold good, NOW, because attacking Trump at this point of time in the road to 2016 WH is too late, foolish and too little.Bush timing of the attack is another case of very poor political and sociological judgment.

Steve Minard

It is absolutely false equivalence to claim that Democrats were "more duped" by this question. NOT wanting to bomb a fictional land is far from the ignorance of agreeing with it. Not saying there isn't a good amount of ignorance on both sides, but there are plenty of instances where a "No" answer is not "being duped."

1) A good number of Democrats would be opposed to ANY bombing. "No" would simply be their moral choice. It would be a non-starter for ANY option proposed.

2) Even if unsure of what Agrabah was, saying you don't want to bomb it when you don't know exactly what it is seems a perfectly legitimate answer. Probably even more so than "I don't know." Perhaps the third option might have been more enlightening had it been "I would need more information."

"Do you want to punch Johnny Boblonsky in the face? Yes or No." Umm... no. Who is he anyway? (Was I "duped?")

3) What about the respondents that actually KNEW it was the Kingdom of Aladdin and said "No, I don't want to bomb a fictional land?"

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader