« Crazy E-Mail of the Day | Main | Rubio, Hillary lead primaries, Paul gaining »

April 03, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


She isn't really liberal enough for my tastes, and I don't love the idea of another Clinton White House, but she's probably the one with better than even odds of holding the White House for the Democrats, which is vital, particularly from a judicial and foreign policy perspective.


Why are you polling Rick Perry but not Ted Cruz, who placed ahead of Perry (and Jindal and Martinez) in the CPAC straw poll?


Too bad Ted Cruz can not apply for that office. Wait a minute, can Pelosi check on him like she did for Obama. He might be able to make it then.


It looks like Kirsten Gillibrand at 7% w/o Hillary is up from the last survey. I hope she will continue to increase her national profile and run in 2016. I would definitely prefer her to Hillary.


Haven't you people had enough liberalism? Our country is in shambles and you want someone to finish the job? Lets go back to the Constitution. I'm tired of liberal dictators giving orders and circumventing the people.

John Cashin

Excuse me but you say Rubio who is not a "Natural Born Citizen" is leading in the polls! How can this be? Senator Rubio was born in Florida in 1971 to TWO Cuban parents whom did not Naturalize until 1975! Then again Mitt Romney's dad George Romney was born in Mexico and not sure when he or if he ever did Naturalize! Then the current POTUS we are at this moment not sure whom his real dad is! Will you please vet these potential candidates before you start doing such polls please?

Diane H. Fabian

That's certainly discouraging.Hillary Clinton has a long record of supporting right-wing policies, most notably those that have taken such a heavy toll on the working class. Ah well, the important thing to today's middle class is how the candidate is packaged and sold, not what his/her agenda actually is.

Diane H. Fabian

Dale, are you serious? Since the 1980s, govt has maintained a strategy of upward wealth redistribution that has been wiping out the country. You know, the old "trickle down economics." Republicans gave us massive job outsourcing, shrinking wages, etc. Between disappearing jobs, extreme economic disparities and government's war against our poor, the country has been in a downward spin for many years. Today, we lead the world ONLY in negative terms -- the highest percentage of people in prison, the worst rates of poverty among all modern nations, an education and jobs system that has pushed the US far behind all the modern nations. By now, I don't believe a single person in politics thinks the US can be saved, so the main objective has been that of getting as much public money into the bank accounts of the elite as possible, before the US collapses.

brian fruman

My prediction is Susan Martinez will run if Hillary does. Polls show them pretty close in the polls edging out a 1 percent edge for Clinton. The one thing the GOP has is young more liberatian style canadates. The democrates don't truly care about the issues anymore than the old republicans they pander to the issue to get votes. All any party needs to do is support sane, reasonable government and the framework is clearly laid out in the Constituion. Right now we have niether on either side of the Isle or in the White House.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader