« | Main | Minnesota supports gay marriage »

October 08, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


So what was your turnout model?


You know, there's this handy button where you can click to see the full results of the poll, including the crosstabs. But here, let me help you out.

Q20 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican,
press 2. If you are an independent or identify
with another party, press 3.

Republican 29%


Rita McClain

Wow, you guys have a sample of D+9 and call it an accurate poll? how do you sleep at night? The fact that you have to manipulate numbers so much to get the amendment to fail is pathetic. When it passes by double digits, I expect to see you guys explain your bias for once.


Rita, the fact that there are more Minnesotans self-identifying as independents/others than Republicans might indicate that a lot of Minnesotans voting for Republicans that don't identify as Republicans -- which wouldn't be surprising given the dramatic shifts from moderate Republican governance to conservative extremism in the past few years.


Thank you for continuing to include the "won't vote" option in your polling on the marriage amendment. I see that this choice now takes 1%, which under MN law would bring the no vote to 50%.

We'll know in a few weeks how this plays out, but there is a decent chance that this special MN rule concerning non-votes could determine the outcome.


Did anyone think that some Republicans also oppose Voter ID, that it's not just partisan opposition?


"When it passes by double digits, I expect to see you guys explain your bias for once." Can we expect an apology from you when this doesn't happen?


The debate is pointless as both sides have their "opinion" but my attitude is "All men are created equal" and "Freedom for all".

Biased personal limitations will fall, if not now, then in time. Gays do not threaten or scare me. Does a gay marriage harm me, my (man/woman) marriage, or marriage in general? I don't see how.


hopefully we can keep society healthy and vote to ban gay marriage, I just think it's unfair they should have it where you need so many in favor of banning to get it to pass, where the no votes don't count, if it was the other way people would be protesting it. It should just be a majority rules

Joseph Norquist

Here is my observation:
We redefined marriage in the Bible when we told David that you can’t have more than three wives. And Jacob you can’t have six wives. And King Solomon, Sir, you’ve got to get rid of 699 wives.

We redefined marriage when we allowed by law, just 45 years ago, people of color to marry white people.

We redefined marriage, the word, when we allowed dictionaries to say,”the 
marriage of two chemicals”, the “marriage of two ideologies” or the “marriage of two
Fortune-500 companies”.

We redefined marriage about 250 years ago when men and women began to marry, not for family or business or community reasons, but for love of each other.

,,,,,when we allowed frivolous weddings on a 100-ft. tower in Las Vegas or under water in a Hollywood swimming pool without mentioning Providence.

.... when we made divorce too easy and stopped pledging “until death do us part.”

.... when we allowed fathers to ignore their parental responsibility.

We redefine marriage now because in the twentieth century we have witnessed the acceptance of GLBT people in all walks of life and the success of thousands of families parented by same-sex couples with love, discipline, security, devotion, and outstanding children. People of Faith support marriage and are going to vote NO in NOvember. Dr. Joe Norquist


To take this debate to another level, who are we as people, as MNs, as Americans, trying to emulate or identify with? Germany held that gays were to be eliminated because they also did not fit their mold of the dominant race. today, many repressive governments enforce the illegality, and many times immortality, of being gay. What is underneath our need to put this into our constitution? I don't feel this is an innocent yes or no vote.
By the way, wanting to have a simple majority to change our constitution, that opens the door to many more frivolous, in my opinion, challenges to the constitution.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader