« | Main | Brown edges Warren by five in MA-Sen. »

August 21, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John Friedson

At this point, most of the Commonwealth realizes that 'Lie-awatha' Warren is a phony who abused the system to get herself into and through school, for starters. Lord knows the voters here in MA are pretty stupid, and generally follow the Democratic party like sheep, but even we occasionally catch on.
Scott being a RINO doesn't hurt him here, either...

Obama 2012

Very disappointing. If Warren can't even win in Massachusetts that says a lot about how far right our country has drifted. Warren is one of the few politicians who speaks the real truth about what's going down... she should be up by 30 points. This is just sad.

Not that I'm giving up. I still think she can and will win. I just don't think that in the end that many voters will vote Obama/Brown.


It's interesting to note some things. First off I can't help but notice that this polling firm doesn't say how many women they poll. This could be the reason that the personhood bill failed overwhelmingly despite this polling firm predicting that it would pass by a large amount of votes.

It seems that polling firms under-estimate women voters.

Dustin Ingalls

Jeff, you comment here all the time (unless it's a different Jeff). As always, demographic info is in the link to the full results at the bottom of the post.


Elizabeth Warren is doing very well in MA, given the obstacles. As this write-up points out, it is almost impossible for someone to unseat an incumbent with high approval numbers and no scandals against them. In fact, Warren should be doing much worse given her newcomer status and Brown's popularity. The recent rise in her unfavorable numbers probably comes as a result of Brown's false accusation that her daughter was involved in registering Welfare recipients. It's a shame that these lies had the impact Brown wanted.

On the bright side, it is still "early" in campaign season. Many are expecting Warren to receive a bump after her prime time convention speech, which will help with her name recognition. Also, it does seem to be unlikely that people in MA will visit the polls and check Obama/Brown. Politics are hyper-partisan this time around, and "the Obama factor" is bound to provide the final bump in this race.


Are you an idiot, Jeff? Click on 'Full results HERE' at the bottom and you can see the questions asked and the topline results. Q12: 52% women, 48% men.


@John Friedson - This type of comment is helpful. Are you trying to say she didn’t work and earn her degree? And concerning her ethnicity, Warren is as much of an Indian as the Chief of the tribe whose blood she has. That is to say, exactly the same percentage.


What I want to know is who paid for the poll of Brown-Warren?

Paul B

It would be interesting to know the methodology of this poll, and whether it differs from others before it. For instance, were the others of likely voters as well? Was the sample back-weighted in this or the previous polls? It's hard to contextualize or see a trend without knowing these things.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader