PPP's first general election poll of Iowa since last October really exemplifies how the Republican nomination process enhanced Barack Obama's chances at reelection. Last fall Obama led Romney only 46-42 there but now his lead is up to 10 points at 51-41, matching his 2008 margin of victory in the state.
The reason for Obama's enhanced standing in the state is pretty simple- over the last six months he's become more popular and Romney's become less popular. Obama was under water at a 43/52 approval spread, now he's on narrowly positive ground at 49/46. The most noteworthy shift has come with independents, who he's gone from 37/54 to 52/41 with.
Romney meanwhile remains incredibly unpopular in Iowa with only 34% of voters rating him favorably to 56% with an unfavorable opinion. He used to have a decent amount of crossover appeal to Democrats with a 17/72 spread, but that's now worsened to 9/86. And with independents he's at an atrocious 28/59.
In the head to head Obama leads with independents by a striking 54/34 margin. Obama gets 90% of the Democratic vote while only 79% of Republicans are committed to Romney. In a sense that's good news for Romney because it indicates he has a lot more room to grow and make Iowa more competitive. But it also speaks to the fact that Obama's base is a lot more sold on him than Romney's is.
The chances of an Iowan running mate for Romney seem pretty small but just for the heck of it we tested Terry Branstad and Steve King as potential ticket mates. Branstad would chop a couple points off Obama's lead, bringing the margin to 50/42. With King as the running mate Obama's lead remains 10 points at 50-40. Iowans are evenly divided on Branstad's performance right now with 43% each approving and disapproving of him. King is not a popular statewide figure with only 25% of voters rating him favorably to 38% with a negative opinion.
Romney actually isn't even the strongest candidate against Obama in Iowa. That designation goes to Ron Paul who trails the President by just 8 points at 47-39. Where Romney trails Obama by 20 points with independents, Paul has only an 8 point disadvantage.
Iowa may get closer between now and November but for now it looks it will fall pretty safely in the Democratic column.
Full results here










Glad to see Obama leading by 10.
Just wondering though, are you planning on releasing Nevada/New Mexico/Montana miscellaneous numbers any time soon? Thanks
Posted by: SB | May 08, 2012 at 04:23 PM
Republicans want a candidate to beat Obama? Every poll I see, time and time again, tells me that candidate is Ron Paul.
Posted by: Peter Peirce | May 08, 2012 at 04:41 PM
I was wondering whether you might poll South Carolina and Georgia any time soon. Both showed some interesting demographic and political shifts last cycle, although neither was quite as significant as North Carolina and Virginia, and I thought it would be interesting to see where things stand after Romney swewed up the nomination. Thanks for the great work!
Posted by: scott | May 09, 2012 at 09:06 AM
Man, I wish I could live in Ronpaulia, where the statement "Ron Paul [trails by] 8 points" becomes evidence of Ron Paul's electoral might.
Posted by: tbert | May 09, 2012 at 10:10 AM
Paucity of polls from Iowa. I have not seen one from there for three months until the PPP released the latest numbers. How about doing a poll in New Hampshire, Minnesota and Michigan, PPP. It has been a while. How about doing a poll on the horserace between Murdock and Donelly in Indiana?
Posted by: George | May 09, 2012 at 10:28 AM
When will you start screening for likely voters?
Posted by: Bazinga! | May 09, 2012 at 12:14 PM