« | Main | Close race in Minnesota, Romney up in Colorado »

February 05, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Obama 2012

I'm amazed that these GOP voters are going back to Santorum again.

I just love watching this whole thing play out; the Republicans are clearly in the process of nominating a guy (Mitt Romney) who is the very definition of underwhelming. That he is having so much trouble beating absolutely ridiculous candidates (neither Gingrich or Santorum could ever be President in a 1000 years) is more than telling.


Co will go for Mitt



"One big advantage Romney has is that his voters are more committed than those of the other candidates."

"Unfortunately for Romney, he comes in last of the 4 candidates among voters who are strongly committed to their candidate."


Mitt will win both states


If Romney was down 2 in Minnesota before Nevada what are the odds he is now ahead thanks to another bump from winning another state?

Mark Eberle (@patcnewsnet)

A few days back I wrote that Rick Santorum is hanging on by a thread. I still believe Santorum is barely surviving, but I also believe this cycle has shown us that a three day period is long enough to turn the primary election upside
down. Santorum isn’t completely out, but he needs some big hitters to come out swinging for him in order to gain some momentum and stay in this thing.
That may start if Michelle Malkin’s endorsement becomes a trend.

Rick Santorum opposed TARP.
He didn’t cave when Chicken Littles in Washington invoked a manufactured crisis in 2008. He didn’t follow the pro-bailout GOP crowd — including Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich — and he didn’t have to obfuscate or
rationalize his position then or now, like Rick Perry and Herman Cain did. He also opposed the auto bailout, Freddie and Fannie bailout, and porkulus bills.
Santorum opposed individual health care mandates — clearly and forcefully — as far back as his 1994 U.S. Senate run. He has launched the most cogent, forceful fusillade against both Romney and Gingrich for their
muddied, pro-individual health care mandate waters.
He voted against cap and trade in 2003, voted yes to drilling in ANWR, and unlike Romney and Gingrich, Santorum has never dabbled with eco-radicals like John Holdren, Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi. He hasn’t written
any “Contracts with the Earth.”
Santorum is strong on border security, national security, and defense. Mitt the Flip-Flopper and Open Borders-Pandering Newt have been far less trustworthy on immigration enforcement.


Disaster for the libertarian wing of the GOP

This is a disaster for the Paul forces. Santorum is the complete opposite of Ron Paul as he wants to keep the GOP free of libertarian influence (for instance he wants more govt regulation of bedrooms of heterosexuals).

Ron Paul is supposed to be the one Romney has to pacify at the convention, not Santorum. If Romney finds he has to promise evangelicals Supreme Court justice picks or anything else that promotes the social conservative agenda, the youth of the Republican Party will not vote in November or they will vote for Gary Johnson (LP).

Effectively, if Santorum ends up having more influence on the GOP ticket than Paul, Obama will definitely get reelected.

I just hope that the main problem has been that Ron Paul's foreign policy views are seen as extreme/unwise, not that social conservatism still has much life left in its domination of the GOP.


Does not appear to me that the Minnesota folks care much for the working people to choose Santorum; a corporate pimp who has access to a Wal-Mart corporate jet. Santorum has also accepted huge contributions from large franchises since he shares their passion to keep worker's wages low and overtime at a very minimum. And let's not discuss Santorum's "dalliances" with a woman not his wife.


Here we go again. Please, these polls are rigged by the GOP and the MSM that favors their globalist new world order candidates. The GOP is worse than ACORN. Romney will win even if no one votes for him. Romney, Newt and Santorum are anti-constitution. Just look at their liberal voting records. Either Americans have undergone a brain transplant or they are suffering from amnesia if they buy this crap. Perception is everything, and these puppet pollsters lie for their puppet masters. Unfortunately, this crap works. The uninformed buy into this nonsense because they do not know any better. Nothing much will ever change unless folks wake up soon. It may be too late already!


Go ahead and keep electing rich politicians and see what you get for President! Mitt is going to be all about taking care of the RICH in this country. Exactly what we need to go bankrupt! We really could use a politician that in the least, has a moral value and a concious about him! Keep electing those with big money to put out the ads that you want to hear, telling you false information on the good people who are trying to sincerely help our country. Santorum is in no way deceptive, he is a man of honor, of his word, and I pray God puts him in office! And some of these folks start eating their words! And Paul is anti-government, just what the other nations need, someone who looks the other way, doesn't care, so they can stab us in the back. A retired gynecologist can't possibly run this country, get real! And for the pot lovers, who think electing Paul will help legalize it, come on, he said he would leave it up to the States! Yeah that is going to work! People hear one thing they like and jump on the dumb wagon! They did the last election too, any man that will turn on his own Pastor of 20 years, is not deceptive huh!


Wow, that was some vintage conspiracy theory right there. Hope you're all stocked up on beans for when the Mayan calendar runs out and the Men in Black use their stolen alien technology from Area 51 to mind-control everyone via the fluoride in the drinking water!

Obama 2012

Dagny - not everything is a conspiracy. The truth is; most people don't think like you do.

Hello Again

After reading these posts I have come to the conclusion the paranoia is more widespread that I had thought.

Charleston Voice

Romney’s Advisors Are Leftist Elites


Not only does Mormon theology, scripture, and revelation contain prophecies, predictions, and "commandments" for the Mormon Church to "roll forth" like a stone, cut from the mountain without hands, to "consume the whole earth", but Mitt Romney and his wife have made some disturbing secret oaths in Mormon temples:

In the Mormon temple "Initiatory", Mitt and his wife have been "anointed to become Kings and Queens, Priests and Priestesses unto the most high God, to rule and reign in the House of Israel forever".

When they first went through the Mormon temple "Endowment", Mitt and his wife not only re-enacted ceremonies and motions of "penalties" such as slashing their own throats and disemboweling themselves, if they should fail to keep secret the oaths they made, but they also made oaths such as:

The Law of Obedience, where the women are placed under covenant to obey their husbands. Sexism anyone?

Perhaps Gingrich could have kept a marriage together if he had an oath-based, patriarchal tyranny over his wife, too!

The Law of Sacrifice:

"And as Jesus Christ has laid down his life for the redemption of mankind, so we should covenant to sacrifice all that we possess, even our own lives if necessary, in sustaining and defending the Kingdom of God [the Mormon Church]."

Do we really want a POTUS who will die for the Mormon Church? And who will sacrifice all he possesses for the Mormon Church? I don't think so. The POTUS must have no higher priority and commitment than the United States of America!

The Law of Consecration:

"...you do consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion."

The POTUS must NOT use the position to build up the Mormon Church! But Mitt has covenanted to do just that!

Our nation cannot be sovereign if our President is not sovereign!

Bringing and end to all nations, including the United States? World domination? Mitt's secret covenants that are anti-American and express fanatic loyalty, with death oaths, to an organization above the supposedly sovereign United States of America and its Constitution?

If it looks like a cult, and Quacks like a cult, It is a cult!


And "Dagny" showing up, tooting the hardcore libertarian horn of "if I can't succeed, it's because other people suck", with just enough of a hint of conspiracy theory to raise a public "lol".


BARRICK GOLD ELKO, NEVADA, IS AIDING AND ABETTING TERRORISM. Why has Elko, Nevada completely dumped its loyalty to America? In patronizing Barrick Gold you’re enriching Adnan Khashoggi who was involved in the Iran/Contra affair and who is a major supporter of Al Qaida?*

Elko rednecks scream the loudest about avenging 9/11 yet prostrate yourselves to its main financier. Do you feel no shame? I’m calling for you all to be rounded up under the Detainee Security Act (that Dean Heller voted for) for aiding and abetting terrorism.

At the very least, why hasn't Barrick been confiscated by the U.S. government for complicity in terrorism?


* Oh, G Wimp Bush, by the way, is on the board of Barrick. Do you see how inbred both the "left" and the "right" are? How much they actually have in common.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader