Newt Gingrich has a large lead in Minnesota...for the moment. Our weekend polling there found him with 36% to 18% for Mitt Romney, 17% for Rick Santorum, and 13% for Ron Paul.
Gingrich shouldn't get too comfortable though. The race in Minnesota is incredibly fluid. 15% of voters are undecided and out of the 85% who do have a current preference, 63% say they could change their minds between now and the caucus in two weeks. That leaves almost 70% of the electorate up for grabs in the closing stretch and it seems likely that the Florida results could have a significant result on the psyche of Minnesota voters. If Romney comes back to win in the Sunshine State it could result in significant improvement in his Minnesota numbers.
All that said, these numbers are clearly very good for Gingrich and very bad for Romney. Gingrich's favorability is a +34 spread (59/25) while Romney's is just +14 (50/36). Since PPP last polled the state in May Gingrich's favorability with GOP voters has increased by 40 points from its previous -6 (35/41) standing.
Gingrich's supporters are also more committed with 39% saying they'll definitely vote for him compared to only 27% who say the same for Romney. Among voters whose minds are totally made up Romney actually drops all the way down to 4th place at 15%, behind Gingrich's 44%, Santorum's 25%, and Paul's 16%.
If Santorum's out of the race by the time Minnesota's vote comes around it could work to Gingrich's further advantage. Santorum voters prefer Gingrich to Romney 44-20 if they had to pick between the two and overall Minnesota Republicans pick Gingrich 50-29 in a head to head with Romney.
Newt's winning with pretty much every key group in Minnesota. He's up 44-12 on Romney with Tea Partiers (Paul's at 18% and Santorum's at 14%) but he's up 33-22 with non-Tea Partiers as well. He's up 44-18 with men, but he's also up 28-19 with women. He leads Romney with Republicans (40-20) but he's also up with independents (26-15) who are likely to be a similar share of the electorate to what they were in Iowa. And Gingrich is winning every age group, although he's tied with Paul among young voters.
Things could change a lot in the next two weeks- that's the story of this year's Republican contest- but for now it looks like Romney could be headed for an embarrassing defeat in a state that he actually won in 2008.
Full results here










Are you going to have a number for the horse race between Obama and Gingrich and Obama and Romney?
Posted by: George | January 25, 2012 at 01:50 PM
It's important to understand that the MN Republican caucus is non-binding.
In 2008, Romney won 41% in the caucus vote. Yet, all of the delegates went to McCain, who only won 22% of the vote. Paul's delegates were simply ignored and counted as abstentions.
The MN GOP decides who gets the delegates, and the caucus results really have no bearing on their decision. This is also the case for the Iowa Republican caucus.
This caucus may have meaning as far as establishing momentum or supporting a narrative, but it has no meaning whatsoever in determining which candidate gets the delegates.
Posted by: Todd Dugdale | January 25, 2012 at 01:56 PM
In 2008 Romney polled 3rd in Minnesota, but the caucuses. Relatively to population other caucuses tend to have at least 3 to 4 times lower turnout than Iowa caucuses, even if the race is still competitive.
In 2008 Nevada caucuses the best poll got Romney's victory margin over 22 points lower, RCP Nevada average was off by over 32 points.
The best Colorado caucus poll underpolled Romney's victory margin by 22 points.
One Minnesota Republican poll showed McCain with 41 percent among Minnesota Republicans, with Huckabee second and Romney third. But caucus-goers actually favored Romney overwhelmingly.
These caucuses that have 3-4 times lower turnout than IA caucuses seem to be impossible to poll. Could we get Florida tracking poll instead of caucus polls?
Posted by: Teemu | January 25, 2012 at 04:46 PM
I think that Paul's policies make him a vote magnet, he will continue to climb as more and more hear his message.
Posted by: Ade | January 26, 2012 at 01:08 AM
Lame! I'm a definite caucus goer. I was never called. The number of those polled make up no more than a good showing at a single house district. IMHO, this was a push poll.
Posted by: Bill Jungbauer | January 26, 2012 at 06:13 PM