« | Main | Gingrich still leads nationally, but declining »

December 20, 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


It will be a good idea to run polls in South Carolina this weekend and the middle of the first week in January 2012. If Gingrich makes a resurgence we will see the first indication in South Carolina. I still have a difficult time believing that southern baptists and evangelicals will vote for a mormon. But, I may be wrong.

Michael Sadowsky

I agree that the early state polling is more important than national polling, but I don't think it's completely irrelevant. Sure in the early states Gingrich is losing a lot of support, but it's not just because people have been paying attention to the race; it's also because as the frontrunner this past month, Newt has been the main target of attacks, such as the many ads Paul is running against him in Iowa. With Newt weakening, Romney will likely face more scrutiny instead, so I'm not so sure his lead will be just as fragile going forward.

I think the national lead shows that if Romney doesn't gain momentum in Iowa and New Hampshire, Newt could still be in a good enough position to make a comeback in South Carolina and Florida. If Romney wins Iowa and New Hampshire, I think that his momentum will overwhelm Newt, but if Paul wins Iowa and comes close/wins in New Hampshire, Romney won't have much momentum and Newt can rebound.

Obama 2012

I agree with Michael Sadowsky.

And certainly Ron Paul, Rick Perry, & Michele Bachmann should be aiming their attack ads at Romney now...

rick geiger

So, everyone now understands that with the Paul thing, Iowa has become irrelevant. We all knew that Romney would do well in NH. That leaves SC next. Newt will not allow Romney and other to attack him 8::1 with impunity anymore, and that is the only reason Romney looks better, because Newt has been the by far the prime subject of most of the trash talking from the elite Repub establishment that want to keep the crony capitalist corruption gig going in DC. And the fact that Newt still has 35%, way above everyone else in your poll even after the massive attacks from all quarters makes the number very relevant.

PPP is well known as a flack for the Obama and the Dems and clearly Obama is VERY afraid of running against Newt and wants Romney to get the nomination..so you are pushing that line... In summary your analysis discounts the numbers...so I ask you, why even do the polling???


Tom, we have now had three pollsters show Gingrich and Romney in a dead heat tie (ABC, CBS and CNN) and a fourth (Gallup) show the race within 2% in the past two days. Serious question - Are you concerned your poll showing a 13% spread might be a little skewed? Are you planning on redoing your national primary poll in the wake of so many other polls showing a much tighter race?


To Rick Geiger:

This Tea Party supporter is totally against Newt... he's worse than Mitt! Since his fellow Republicans booted him from Congress, it looks like he'll shill for just about anyone willing to give him some money for Tiffany's. Mitt Romney never sat on a couch with Nancy Pelosi for cash.

Still, the only real, principled conservative in the race is Congresswoman Michele Bachmann. She's taken on the establishment and big Wall Street banks, opposing the TARP bailout for Wall Street. But she's also willing to take on big government, even if it means opposing the big spenders in her own party. She is guided by the Constitution -- not whoever gives her a paycheck.

Obama is so weak that it's time to elect a REAL conservative... Michele Bachmann is the only candidate I'm considering!

Tom Jensen


No, we're going to use our resources to keep on regularly polling Iowa and New Hampshire. That's considerably more important now than the national picture.

Obama 2012

Rick: The idea that the Obama campaign is afraid to run against Newt is preposterous. They would absolutely love it if Newt were to win the nomination. I think they are probably trying to to even think about that gift... it's better to focus on the much more realistic (and much more dangerous) opponent: Mitt Romney.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader