« Cain still leads in NC, ME; Snowe not in trouble in primary | Main | North Carolina remains close »

November 01, 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Gerald

I don't see how this is even a close contest. Although PPP's polling provides a valuable service to the public, PPP surely does these state polls in part as a way to market its polling expertise to potential clients. In that regard, it does absolutely nothing for PPP to poll in Kentucky, where the race is a foregone conclusion. It does a little bit more than nothing for PPP to poll in MS.

In contrast, polling IA SD 18 gives PPP the opportunity to once again show off to the world its superior capabilities. Special elections are notoriously difficult to poll. But PPP showed its abilities by accurately calling both the NY-9 race and the WI recall races this year. It is hard to see how PPP could opt not to poll IA SD 18. I'd also note that polling SD 18 would serve a real public service, as there has not been a single poll on that race to date.

David

Am I right in thinking that KY gets us Prez and MS & OH get us Prez and Sen too?

dominic

*** READ THIS ***

In Kentucky the Dem Governor has been shown to have at least a 25 point (you read that correctly) lead in every poll, the state legislature is NOT up at the same time making kentucky the most boring place to poll ever. Don't waste your vote.

Ok, you can stop reading.

-

Anyways it's ridiculous that more people didn't suggest the virginia legislature, and it's more ridiculous that of the current options here Ohio isn't winning. Whatever.

Vote for mississippi or ohio btw, who gives a fuck about some iowa state senate election, I'm assuming the poll is being rigged?

The Interesting Times

I voted for Mississippi because that state hasn't been polled on *anything* since April. The last time Mississippi was polled, Huckabee was winning it.

Iowa and Ohio, on the other hand, get polled here every month or two.

That said, I would be surprised if Iowa and Ohio didn't win, because they win every time you include them as options. Which means we lose yet another chance to get more recent polling data on Mississippi...

Dean

If you poll Ohio, make sure to use the EXACT same language on the union question as will appear on the ballot. It seems that there's been some reasonable doubt about your last poll (raised even by the unions that would be happy with the result) due to the phrasing of your question and it would be interesting to control for that variable and see if the unions and working class are still kicking ass or not.

Mose

I would encourage people to vote for PPP to poll in Mississippi. The last time PPP polled in MS was all the way back in March, while IA (October), OH (October), and KY (September) were all polled much more recently. Back in March, PPP showed Romney leading Obama by only six points (46-40), which represented a seven point improvement by Obama over his 2008 performance (Obama lost to McCain 56-43). However, Obama's numbers declined somewhat over the summer. It would be interesting to see if that decline was reflected in MS, and in any event the change (if any) in the MS numbers from March to November would be more informative than the changes in the other states over only a month or two.

Mike A

For those who don't know, if the R's win the Iowa 18th election, there will be untrammeled GOP havoc in Iowa for the next year.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2014

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.


WSJ Graphic

CONTACT US

Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us

RECENT POSTS

Categories

HIRE PPP

Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >

FOLLOW US

Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader
Email Sign up: New Polling Data email