As long as the Republicans nominate one of their co-front runners, Mitt Romney or Rick Perry, they're likely to keep South Carolina in their column pretty easily next year. That's no surprise. What makes the Presidential numbers in the Palmetto State more interesting though is that despite Perry being the overwhelming favorite of Republican primary voters in the state, Romney actually does 7 points better than him against Barack Obama.
Romney leads Obama by 15 points, 53-38, while Perry's lead is only 8 points, at 49-41. They win Republicans by almost identical margins- 91-4 for Romney and 89-4 for Perry. And they lose Democrats by pretty identical margins too- an 88-9 deficit for Perry, an 86-10 one for Romney. But the real disparity is with independent voters. Romney leads Obama by 16 points with them, 44-28. Perry wins them only narrowly by 3 points at 37-34. This has been a theme in our recent polling. GOP voters like Perry better than Romney. But independents are a lot more willing to vote for Romney than Perry. In a state like South Carolina the 7 point difference between how Perry and Romney fare in the general doesn't matter that much. In the Floridas and Ohios and Virginias of the world it matters a lot. It's going to be interesting to see whether the gap continues and whether Romney has any luck making an electability argument with Republicans voters if it does.
Obama's actually pretty competitive with the other three Republicans we tested head to head with him in South Carolina. He ties Sarah Palin at 45% and ties Michele Bachmann at 44% as well, while trailing Newt Gingrich by only a single point at 45-44. He leads all 3 of them by double digits with independent voters.
Obama is not remotely popular in South Carolina- a 41% approval rating with 56% of voters disapproving of him. But he's competitive with that second tier of Republican hopefuls because they're pretty unpopular themselves. Bachmann's favorability spread is 34/43 and Palin at 36/56 and Gingrich at 27/53 are a whole lot worse off than that.
Just for fun we also decided to take a look at how home state hero Stephen Colbert would do in an independent bid for President. Tested in a three way he polls at 12% compared to 43% for Perry and 36% for Obama. Colbert does particularly well with independents, actually edging out Obama 24-22 and trailing Perry's 27% by only a small margin. Colbert has a positive 33/22 favorability rating with independents, quite a contrast to Perry's 31/38 and Obama's 34/53 approval with them. Independents are pretty disgusted with all politicians right now and Colbert's strong standing with them is symbolic of that.
Full results here










Rasmussen came out with this morning:
Perry 44
Obama 41
Obama 43
Romney 39
This would kill the electability argument for Romney.
Posted by: Michael Low | September 01, 2011 at 04:10 PM
I think Rasmussen's an outlier on that, at least for now. We pretty consistently find Romney doing better than Perry on our polls.
Posted by: Tom Jensen | September 01, 2011 at 04:11 PM
I think that there can be a pretty solid argument made for the fact that Romney is just much better known to the general electorate than Rick Perry is. The better he's known with the general electorate (and not just the GOP voters), the better he'll do. I think a lot of Romney's support is pretty soft.
Posted by: Steve | September 01, 2011 at 04:18 PM
The National Journal released a poll today taken among Democrat and Republican insiders. They overwhelmingly believe Romney is the best candidate to take on Obama: http://bit.ly/p9hZh9
Posted by: Wyatt | September 01, 2011 at 04:50 PM
Keep it up Mitt! You can win this thing!
Posted by: Lori | September 01, 2011 at 04:51 PM
Romney clearly has the best chances against Obama at the national level. Perry doesn't bring any blue states into play and doesn't appeal to independents or moderates in purples states. With the prospect of a Bush-but-dumber Republican in the White House, President Obama will easily hold most of his 2008 states and win comfortably.
Which is why it's so wonderful to see Perry taking the lead over Romney in a big way.
Posted by: realnrh | September 01, 2011 at 07:30 PM
I think that as Perry becomes more well known, his approval will move, in either direction. If people discover they do not like him as much as they do now, Romney support will solidify. If they continue to adore him, he will win the GOP nomination. However, the most likely outcome is somewhere in between, so I think the primaries will be very interesting between the two.
Posted by: peterh | September 01, 2011 at 11:40 PM
I wouldn't write off South Carolina. I think if Perry is the nominee and Obama has a good year he could very well end up winning it.
Perry has said a lot of absolutely insane things and the guy has a bunch of skeletons in his closet.
As a supporter of President Obama; I am very pleased about Perry's surge. Obama will beat Perry.
Posted by: I Am Iron Man | September 02, 2011 at 01:58 PM
I'm a solid Romney supporter. We want someone who can beat Obama, and Perry can't. And heaven help us... no to a former Alaskan governor candidate for Pres.!
Posted by: Joan H. | September 03, 2011 at 12:19 AM
Romney clearly has the best chances against Obama at the national level. Perry doesn't bring any blue states into play and doesn't appeal to independents or moderates in purples states.
Posted by: Küstenpatent, | January 19, 2012 at 05:40 AM