« Romney leads in NV, momentum for Perry | Main | Sanders, Dean no threat to Obama in VT Dem primary »

August 04, 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

St. Louis Oracle

Numbers glitch? Huntsman gets 3% with Palin in the field but drops to 1% after redistributing her vote to others?Also surprising that the second biggest recipient of Palins 2nd choice votes is Newt.


Pawlenty at 1% is just hilarious. Huntsman just rolled out of bed and hes tripling T-Paw.


You said Perry gets 11 and 2 when Palin is not included. I assume you meant Pawlenty gets 2.Also is there any explanation why Huntsman loses support when Palin is not included? I saw this the other day in Virginia when Perry lost 2% when Palin wasnt included too. Why does this happen? It makes no sense.

I Am Iron Man

This talk of a primary challenge of Obama from the left is stupid. Really really stupid. Its a total waste of energy. Lets focus on the Republicans that are destroying this country and stop focusing our anger at the only guy we have on our side (and yes Obama is on our side - its just a very difficult battle from his perspective... please be pragmatic and intelligent... not reactionary - when you are reactionary you are no better than a conservative.)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader