« | Main | Despite approval decline, Haley still tops Sheheen in re-do »

June 09, 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


BTW, Have you polled Johnson vs Obama in N.M. I would be interested to see the results after seeing this poll.


Johnson not only won election in N.M. he won re-election. As this shows he is still popular there, which can not be said of the others.


Why was Perry polled over Paul? I am sorry if I come off as another annoying Paul supporter, but Perry polls at around 5% at best whereas Paul is much higher and is actually announced.

Dustin Ingalls

A Republican candidate that can win his home Democrat state is a solution.There isnt one of those. The closest might be Romney in his second-home New Hampshire; he was one point behind Obama when we last polled that state.


@Stephen - Id be interested to see statewide polling data for Dr. Paul as well. As far as your stats go, one district does not a state make, but neither does one decision a Presidency make(Obama and OBLs death).


Im from Texas and dont like Perry. So I wouldnt say its too far off as most Ive talked to lean slightly more toward not liking him. He got re-elected as the better of two options. That is just my opinion though and should be taken as just that, opinion.


Interesting poll. Also interesting that Ron Paul is continually left out of mainstream media polls...I mentioned that this morning on my blog.


A Republican candidate that cant win his home Republican state is a problem. A Republican candidate that can win his home Democrat state is a solution.

Stephen VanDyke

Ron Pauls approval rating in his district was 84% approving of his job and 79% favorability (not a real word) according to a Moore Information survey conducted for Paul’s campaign in February 2010.I doubt its strayed far, but obviously this poll doesnt see fit to include him so I thought Id undumb these results with a comment.http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33640_Page3.html


LOL! I can tell your polls are bogus because its not possible for Rick Perry to have a -8 rating in Texas UNLESS YOUR SAMPLING IS WAY OFF. This is to manipulate public opinion. Of course you do know how to sample correctly but only when election time comes around to obtain more accurate results to acheive an acceptable reputation.

Dustin Ingalls

With nothing interesting going on there, doubtful well be polling Utah.

Kevin Hotaling

Its a bit ridiculous to exclude Ron Paul considering that the latest poll Ive seen shows him with a 79% favorability rating.http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33640_Page3.html


It is possible to win the Presidency without winning ones own state -- as Al Gore came close to doing in 2000. I am not surprised that Mitt Romney fares badly in Massachusetts and that Tim Pawlenty fares badly in Minnesota; they became Governors when conservative solutions suddenly became popular. Such solutions, when put into practice, have faded in attractiveness in liberal-leaning states. Rick Perry? Maybe Texans are getting tired of him. That happens over time.


While Gary Gov. Veto Johnson may have been unpopular with the NM legislature it seems like the citizens still appreciate him! This is just fine since they are the ones who vote. =)


Could you check Huntsmans popularity in Utah in the near future? I imagine him still being quite popular over there, but I have no idea to what extent.


I wonder what Ron Pauls favorability is in Texas. Any numbers?

Dustin Ingalls

Texas would be the only state with to home-field advantage candidates wouldnt it?No, Minnesota also.And you had a lot of ifs--IF the economy fails, IF Johnson gets better known, IF he even runs and stays through the primaries, etc., etc.


Paul is wildly popular in his district, but not necessarily Texas overall. Huntsman is a mixed bag. A lot of us in Utah despise him, but he has his fans. Hes Mormon, so it helps here.


Correction: An earlier version of this article listed incorrect favorable and job approval ratings in Pauls internal polling. This is posted at the bottom of the article that people are quoting about Ron Paul. I like Ron Paul, but Gary Johnson is a far better candidate. He is the first candidate that I am finding myself wanting and willing to campaign for. Johnson 1012


Why did you exclude Ron Paul from this poll? Hello? Anyone Home? McFly? Ron Paul is an official presidential candidate. Whos in charge here?


Theres a person you seemed to forget. His name is Ron Paul. Heard of him? Hes running for president. Perry is not running for president. Whos in charge here? Anyone home? Hello? McFly? Ron Paul presidential candidate


Whos in charge here? Theres a man named Ron Paul. Heard of him? Hes running for President. Rick perry is not running for president. Have you considered including Ron Paul? Hello? Anyone home? McFly?


@ Dustin Ingalls Governor Johnson was a Republican governor that won over his Democratic state not once but twice. That is the point Kreationz was trying to make. Progressives who rightfully feel betrayed by Obama would do themselves and the nation a favor by supporting Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, both of whom will enact policy, domestic and foreign, that would save our economy and both of whom are strong champions of civil liberties and economic freedom. If youre against these things, why are you an American? Better yet, why are you running the country? (Im talkin to you, continuing-endless-war-not-closing-guantanamo-bay-PATRIOT ACT-extender-torture-apologizer-hypocrite Obama!)


gary johnson and rick perry are included in the poll, but not ron paul. umm.. weird.


I will concede that he would have problems in the more conservative parts of the South than other Republicans. However, with Republican heavy South, the question becomes can they over-look the social issues in order to defeat Obama?


Not a lot of ifs just one big one. However, he has overcome that one on a state level before.With Rick Perry now likely to enter the race, Im curious as what a Texas GOP nomination poll will say especially if its just Perry vs Paul. Texas would be the only state with to home-field advantage candidates wouldnt it?

Dustin Ingalls

I think if Johnson get the nomination. N.M. may come into play as a toss up. However, with only 5 electoral votes, I doubt that would make a big difference.Thats a lot of ifs in your scenario. If he did make NM competitive, which is still not likely, hed be a worse candidate than other Republicans elsewhere.

Bill McGonigle

I think its obvious why Dr. Paul was excluded - his numbers would defeat the thesis. The poll report title is intended to create public perception that the Republican field has nobody in it that can win. Dr. Pauls numbers defeat the thesis, so they were omitted. I wonder if PPP actually polled for him and left them out or decided not to poll for him based on the general knowledge of his high approval rating at home. Hes a real contender by the vast majority of straw and telephone polls - certainly rating much higher than some of the candidates included here - so that cant be the reason for the omission. PPP can go ahead and prove me wrong, though (but I expect this comment will just get deleted since they seem to want to shape opinion).


I guess that means he has at least some crossover support there. Also not bad for a 2:1 Dem state getting a better than 1.5:1 vote. Closer to the Primary there and depending on how the economy fairs there, he could do rather well considering the other 13% undecided and polling margin of error. I think if Johnson get the nomination. N.M. may come into play as a toss up. However, with only 5 electoral votes, I doubt that would make a big difference. Id also like to see how he fairs in a large liberal state like CA once his name recognition gets up more and with the economic/budget issues its having. Being able to take a state like that(55 electoral votes) would give him a serious shot at beating Obama in the general. Of course that is all speculative.Thank you for posting the N.M. Data for me even if its 4 months old.

Dustin Ingalls

BTW, Have you polled Johnson vs Obama in N.M. I would be interested to see the results after seeing this poll.All of these numbers come from polls taken earlier this year. In early Feb., Obama was beating Johnson, 51-36, but thats better than any of the other Republicans did. Romney was down 16, Huckabee 19, Gingrich 21, and Palin 29.


When I said one big one, there was several smaller ones mixed in to it. The big one is if he gets the nomination, which Im confident as he overcomes the smaller ifs he will. He had to do all that to go from an unknown to get the GOP nod for Governor. Only time will tell if he can do it again to get the GOP nod for President. Hes overcome a lot of obstacles in his life. And me, Im a supporter and I know Ill be doing everything I can to try to make that happen.

Jeff Sexton

Anyone got a link to the actual polls involved??

Jeff Sexton

Dustin: Thanks!

Doctor Jones

Why would you poll Gary Johnson who isnt registering nationally and not one of the frontrunners in Ron Paul?

Dustin Ingalls

Georgia:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_GA_0405217.pdfTexas:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_TX_0120513.pdfNew Mexico:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_NM_0209513.pdfPennsylvania:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_PA_0412513.pdfMassachusetts:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MA_0609.pdfMinnesota:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MN_0606.pdfAlaska:http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_AK_1031503.pdf


No doubt Ron is popular in his district, but Id like to see some statewide numbers as well for him. Why does he continually run for Rep. when a senate seat holds more power? I thought he should have made the switch a long while back. Being from Texas he would have had my vote for that. Im not from his district however.


Clearly, clearly, clearly Ron Paul was left out of this poll so that the author could promote his version of reality. This is plain and simple intellectual dishonesty. Im growing very weary of people stating the facts that fit with their agenda. Politicians lie and and political writers lie. No wonder our county is what it is instead of what it could and should be.


Once again, Ron Paul gets no mention. Why bother posting the results of a poll if your not going to actually include the real results?


How stupid do you think voters are? Ron Paul won his last congressional race with a 70% thrashing of his Dem opponent. That is the purest form of approval rating one can get.I like Gary Johnson; but I am not an idiot. Ron Paul is the most experienced electioneer in the mix. Next time you write a piece (quote polling results) do it accurately and completely. There are plenty of us who have IQs higher than room temperature. Quit assuming we dont.


What kind of joke of a polling organization includes Sarah Palin who isnt even running, but not Ron Paul, who has been polling in the top 5 candidates since the get go?


Oh come on. Id love to see these numbers for Ron Paul. Either oversight or blatant.


I like Johnson. I also like Ron Paul, and worked for him in 2008. It is telling that out of all the candidates, Pauls numbers were left out of this comparison. I suspect that s because he probably polls close to Johnson in New Mexico.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader