« Limbaugh would be weak against Nelson | Main | Bill Nelson Would Beat Rush Limbaugh in 2012 »

October 14, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0133f2dd8001970b01543205922f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Murkowski's in it...and Crist is not:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dustin Ingalls

Unfortunately it is impossible to calculate the numbers of people that will not bother writing in a nameYeah, its very difficult, and Murkowskis support is still probably overstated, even though we asked a two-part question--the first being if they were voting for McAdams or Miller or someone else, and then the someone else voters were asked if they were voting for such and such, some other guy, writing in Murkowski, or writing in someone else. We then combined that question into the first for an aggregate. Murkowski was getting about 95% of the someone else people.

DBL

In Florida you can find Charlie Crist at the bottom of the ballot. In Alaska you have to write Linda Murjelewski on the ballot and hope it counts. Or maybe youll forget shes running. PPPs prompt of someone else isnt an explicit question on the ballot.

Anonymous

Unfortunately it is impossible to calculate the numbers of people that will not bother writing in a name...shes taost as a write in---maybe if she were on the actual ballot.

Dustin Ingalls

For comparison, what are Murkowskis and McAdams favorability scores?44-26 for McAdams and 48-46 for Murkowski.

wt

Well, yes. But also, despite McAdams running some great ads, hes not really viable at this point, so Dems have the tempting option to choose Murkowski over Miller. (See also, Lieberman v. Schlesinger).Meek in FL has done a great job of holding onto a fraction of the Dem base, which is what is stopping Crist from closing the gap with Rubio.

Dale Sheldon-Hess

Question:For comparison, what are Murkowskis and McAdams favorability scores?@Joel: we can get a Democrat; McAdams has gained 8 points in the polls in the two weeks since his first TV spot hit. And while Miller would be a rhetorical nightmare, but Murkowski would vote the same way on everything as he would, so the practical advantages are minimal.

joel

So if 58% dont like Miller it would be really bad for the state if he wins. I think polling in Alaska underestimates a lot of conservative votes, a lot of people live in the middle of nowhere and are hard to reach.I remember that Begich was heavily favored over Stevens in 2008 and he barely won. Same with Young pollster always show his elections closer than reality.Not sure how that plays out for Miller but I would rather see Murkowski win if we cant get a democrat.

Jonny V

Also: Scott McAdams is very viable in Alaska. If he can get the Democratic and leaning left voters in Alaska to vote for him instead of tossing away their vote on Lisa M - he will win.Joe Miller is a lunatic and Lisa M is politics as usual.Vote Scott McAdams.

Jonny V

As a far left liberal (an actual far left liberal, the type that knows Obama is a centrist) I really wish Kendrick Meek would drop out of the Florida race and support Crist. Marco Rubio is a nut. We cant have him in the Senate.Meek: Do whats right for the country. Endorse Crist.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2014

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.


WSJ Graphic

CONTACT US

Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us

RECENT POSTS

Categories

HIRE PPP

Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >

FOLLOW US

Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader
Email Sign up: New Polling Data email