« Close Senate race in Colorado | Main | Manchin favored in WV »

October 31, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0133f2dd8001970b015432058ecd970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Miller leads in Alaska:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Anonymous

Do you think its an issue that your poll specifically asked Lisa Murkowskis name instead of forcing voters to volunteer it? Thats probably overstating her numbers, but the question is to what degree.

akfisherman49

Murkowsis numbers are declining. McAdams support continues to grow and he has by far the highest favorability of anyone in the race. McAdams is on the ballot and is the only candidate who can beat Joe Miller.

Ted

Very interesting results. Do you have any explanation for the difference between PPPs results and those of other recent polls showing Murkowski ahead? Just curious.Thanks!

sybilll

Has the tail stopped wagging the dog?

teacherken

how do you account for poll that showed Miller a distant 3rd and sinking? And did the Republican campaign committee actually come in for Murkowski?

Anonymous

Lisa bought the native Alaskan vote. If they come out in force, Lisa will win. My vote is for Joe.

Susan

Glad to see Miller doing so well.Im sending you a video: Who does America work for? America needs to see this video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr3WE6iAhHg

Chuck T

Im picking Alaska as my election night surprise with McAdams winning. I think that a lot of the Dems who are writing in Murkowski will in the end vote for McAdams. I think that Murkowski and Miller have been so negative that in the end some of the indies will go for the good guy too. Well, I made my prediction and Im stuck with it!

Anonymous

You guys promised to do AK-AL!!!

Anonymous

The poll that showed Joe Miller behind by 16 points was done by Alaskans Standing Together, a pro-Lisa Murkowski group. It was probably a push poll. I live in Anchorage and have been on the receiving end of a few of these over the years (always by people for the candidate that is losing at the time). For example they could have asked the question, Given that Joe Miller is an admitted liar and wants to hurt Alaskas economy, who will you vote for: Joe Miller, Scott McAdams, or write-in LISA MURKOWSKI.

Anonymous

Murkowski, McAdams, and the media have launched an all out negative blitz against The West Point honors war hero father of 8 children. Negative story after negative story on Millers personal character. Yet the media doesnt bother digging into Murkowskis or McAdams personal history. They dont bother telling us about Murkowskis record in the Senate, or her views on the issues.Millers negatives are high specifically because of this orchestrated coordinated attack on his personal character. I know it wont happen, but I would like the media to do their homework and treat the candidates fairly and equally.

Anonymous

Polling in Alaska is terribly difficult. For instance, 13 percent of people in Alaska Native villages had no telephone service compared to 2 percent at the national level, according to a 2006 GAO study. With Millers outright hostility to Native people and the ballot measure #1, I think Alaska Natives, who make up 16 percent of the voter age population, will be voting in full force tomorrow. Well see which polls are right I hope not too soon in the future...

Dustin Ingalls

I wouldnt think the overseas vote would have much impact on the results. Our home state, NC, is an even bigger military state, and our results here have still been very accurate without polling them.

Kansan

Eric Donderos comments are the most laughable on this site.Hes sure that Alaskans wouldnt vote for Democrats, yet the Alaska state senate is split 10-10, the state has elected more Democrats to the U.S. Senate than Republicans and the same number of Governors.Hes a libertarian but was a co-founder of the the group that promoted Sarah Palin as McCains vice presidential nominee. Shes against drugs, though she used them. Shes against abortions in cases of rape and incest though she appeared to do her best, though unsucessfully, to miscarry her Down syndrome child. Shes against out of control spending but her administration hugely overspent even with oil prices at historic highs. She lied about virtually everything, as the public soon found out two years ago. She is personally perhaps the most avaricious politician to appear on the American scene in years.Dondero compares McAdams in the polls to Murkowski and Miller, but Miller has actually tanked, big time, in the polls. He wont poll 30% and only will get near that because early voters were unaware that he was such a fraud and a liar. Palins endorsement is worth next to squat in Alaska. He won the primary by publicly rejecting all those things he did secretly and getting a free ride from the press.McAdams is finally being noticed, by a media that was entirely captivated by a candidate that was rejected by the national party establishment versus a Tea Party favorite who benefited from a flood of Koch Industries arms length outside money. Scott is surging in the polls.http://alaskadispatch.com/blogs/palin-watch/5313-is-palin-losing-ak-voters

Anonymous

The other polls were all paid for by vested interests aka the Murkowski campaign, the Natives, and the Democratic party. Rasmussen and this poll are the only ones polling Alaska without a vested interest.The others are essentially internal polls.Also when it comes down to the wire independent candidates almost always fade and recent events in Alaska, such as the write in candidate list being given to voters, and intimidation of a radio talk show host may have created a backlash against Murkowski.Event his poll probably overestimates her support because they provided her name. The oversees military vote (unpolled)which is substantial in Alaska will also go for Miller a bronze cross war veteran.Id go with lower, maybe 25%.

Dustin Ingalls

becasue that was a jimmied poll dude. they are now at the end and have to stop baking and faking the numbers. this is the poll they will hang their accuracy rating on. so they stop the funny business. which in most cases is an attempt to bolster the dems. get their base out, etc. bascially to help the dems. when its time for the truth, at the end, even thse guys stop lieing.That poll he was referring to wasnt ours. Weve had Miller leading all three times weve looked at the race since the primary. And, of course, we dont jimmy polls. We use the same methodology every time, and our business revenue depends on our accuracy all year, not just in the final week. We had a remarkably good record in the primaries.Also: correction to what I said earlier, when I was going on a hunch. After doing a little math, McAdams actually would still be a point or two shy of winning if Murkowski wasnt getting any of the Dem vote at all. But he would still have significantly more support and be close to winning.

Anonymous

Lisa was given that senate seat by her daddy, and no one should be able to take it away from her. It is her inheritance, her birthright. I sure hope the people of Alaska realize that having a monarchy is not all bad. After all, wouldnt Lisa look terrific in a crown and cape?

Dustin Ingalls

Do you think its an issue that your poll specifically asked Lisa Murkowskis name instead of forcing voters to volunteer it? Thats probably overstating her numbers, but the question is to what degree.Obviously respondents to an automated poll cant totally volunteer a response--it has to be mentioned by the recording and have a corresponding button to push. But what we did, as on the Alaska poll we did for Daily Kos, is ask two questions--the first if they will vote for McAdams, Miller, or someone else, and then of those who say someone else, if they will vote for minor candidate A, minor candidate B, write in Murkowski, or write in someone else. We just combined that and the leaner question into one final result to report.Bottom line: Alaskans simply do not want to vote for a Democrat.For a state with such a huge GOP registration advantage, Democrats have been doing remarkably well there of late. See: Begichs victory over Stevens in a year Palin was bringing even more Republicans to the polls than usual; and Knowles almost beating Murkowski last time in another somewhat Republican year.You take the combined Murkowski/Miller vote and thats 67%.Not exactly. Murkowskis getting 28% of the Democratic vote, just slightly more than shes even getting of her own partys vote. The real story is that there are just way more Republicans (at 32% of the electorate) than Democrats (21%), and that Murkowski is getting the support of a lot of Democrats who dont think McAdams can win. If they did, hed win easily because Murkowski and Miller would be splitting the GOP.

Anonymous

Ill be happiest if Murkowski loses, period. Shes the textbook example of an unprincipled politician who cares only about her own power-seeking. Shes wholly worse than your average despicable politician.watch this

Anonymous

how do you account for poll that showed Miller a distant 3rd and sinking? And did the Republican campaign committee actually come in for Murkowski? - becasue that was a jimmied poll dude. they are now at the end and have to stop baking and faking the numbers. this is the poll they will hang their accuracy rating on. so they stop the funny business. which in most cases is an attempt to bolster the dems. get their base out, etc. bascially to help the dems. when its time for the truth, at the end, even thse guys stop lieing. funny huh? but thats whats going on. if you beleived that earlier poll, you were a useful idiot. just what they wanted you to be. a dupe. mind numbed robot. Bottom line: Alaskans simply do not want to vote for a Democrat. - uh, yeah, duh. neither does anyone else in the country guy. the generic ballot question tilts GOP more than it ever has in history. since theyve been polling it. BHO is in the slow motion process of brininging hope and change to the country. destroying the dems except for the coasts, making them a regional party(and when the new doofus gov in cali crashes the state that coast will be gone too) and a GOP majority for a generation. just in time for the grown-ups to cleanup the mess both parties have made the last 20 years.

Paul B.

Look at the wording of the polls first question:In the election for US Senate will you vote for Democrat Scott McAdams, Republican Joe Miller, nonaffiliated candidate Tim Carter, nonaffiliated candidate Ted Gianoutsos, Libertarian Fredrick Haase, or are you going to write in Lisa Murkowski, or are you planning to write in someone else?That is improper, loaded wording. A write-in is just that - written in. The list of registered write-in candidates is not provided to the voters except on request:the Supreme Court decision allows voters at early voting sites to see the lists if they say they need help and want to be shown a list of write-in candidates.Most voters probably will not bother. They will enter the booth and pick one of the listed candidates.This question should have said, ... or will you write in your own choice. Then a follow-up question could have probed which write-in those who would write in would choose.This means that Murkowskis numbers are grossly inflated. And given AKs Republican bent, I believe that Miller will be its next senator.

Eric Dondero

Bottom line: Alaskans simply do not want to vote for a Democrat. Funny how PPP spins the results to show that McAdams is somehow well-liked. Yet they dont even mention the obvious. Alaskans just dislike Democrats, and anyone with a D by their name.You take the combined Murkowski/Miller vote and thats 67%. Thats a whopping rejection of the Democrat Party and Democrat policies. Murkowski has said she would remain a Republican.Why PPP didnt you say a single word about this?

Anonymous

Alaskas own Dittman poll is the most reliable and most accurate for years on end. Dittman polls Alaskans as giving Murkowski the seat again by a large margin. A month ago she still had it the only change now is the backlash on Miller but he deserves all the scrutiny and disdain for being a CREEP.http://www.newsminer.com/pages/full_story/push?blog-entry-Dittman+poll+on+Senate+race%20=9367869&instance;=blogs_editors_desk

kb

Most of the world is headed for a massive train wreck. The United States has borrowed & printed so much money that we are very much a part of this train wreck. We can thank both parties for getting us in this problem. The lefts answer is to spend, spend, spend on more government. The RINOS are basically going along with this, but claiming their not. The Tea Party Candidates are the only candidates sincerely and intelligently planning on how were going to avoid or minimize this total collapse.Our great state of Alaska is not immune to this train wreck and those who are too naive to recognize this, will vote for either Mcadams or Murcowski...those whos eyes and ears have been open and can see through the corrupt media and political spin...will vote for JOE MILLER! Its your choice and your future!

Anonymous

Alaska polls are notoriously inaccurate/unreliable. Cant tell you how many times Don Young was supposed to lose.

Anonymous

Typical teabagging nonsense--theyd rather vote for a crook than admit that they bet the wrong horse. Same thing in Colorado, Wisconsin and Nevada--the idiots are coming out in force to vote for one of their own, no matter what that may do to the country or to their states, for that matter. Not so in New York and Delaware where reason appears to prevail (where it did not in the GOP primaries). In Illinois, Republicans are lining up to vote for a serial liar; in Wisconsin their chosen candidate lobbied against a bill on behalf of pedophiles; in Colorado and Alaska GOP candidates are lawyers who were nearly disbarred (and not-so-nearly fired) for unethical behavior.When you are really, really stupid, admitting a mistake is not an option. So the entire bunch who approve of Miller will vote for him--and no one else will join them.

wt

Im no huge Miller fan, but the Alaska media conspiring against him (and giving credence to Palins lamestream media indictments) can only help him win this race. Tough to see how he loses this race on Tuesday.

Anonymous

Hard to believe any poll these days. It does suggest that one ought to vote for who they believe is the best candidate and bollocks all the posturing to vote for the lesser of the evils.

Dorran

The wild differences in poll results have to do with the notorious difficulty of polling a write-in candidates actual supporters -- will they actually bother to write her name in the booth, or say the heck with it and darken Millers oval? Thats particularly hard to know in a pre-election poll. When in doubt, ALWAYS check the polls internals and examine the methodology and statistics of the survey.

Anonymous

@ Kansas:Yawn. Typical liberal SSDD.- Kansas2

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2014

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.


WSJ Graphic

CONTACT US

Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us

RECENT POSTS

Categories

HIRE PPP

Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >

FOLLOW US

Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader
Email Sign up: New Polling Data email