« Carney leads | Main | »

September 16, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Christian Liberty

Their book Young Guns is available now -- Sept 14 on Amazon -- not after the election. Cantor, Ryan, and McCarthy acknowledge to frustrated voters that Republicans had failed to govern according to conservative principles and pledge to reform Washington rather than allow power to be the end in itself. The book is being launched to drive the midterms rather than held back to drive the transition. Cantor is the most natural leader of the bunch, but he is already in line to be majority leader. Ryan is poised to chair Budget and in time even to chair Ways and Means. Cantor elevated McCarthy to chief deputy whip and it was Boehner who tapped McCarthy to chair the Republican Platform Committee. Boehner also supports the earmark ban proposed by the three reformist leaders. Current leadership is already recognizing and elevating the three young reformers. I would be more convinced if those elevating their public profile were not already in leadership positions. Why challenge Boehner when they are in line to be elevated anyway? Boehner was a committee chair who ran as a reform candidate who sought to reform earmarks and rein in government spending. These themes are still the values of the reformist wing of the GOP caucus. Boehner as a committee chair was not directly in line for leadership like Blunt was in 2006 or Cantor is now. Shadegg was a conservative from the Republican Study Committee, but is now retiring. While the poll may show desire for new leadership, who is challenging leadership today from within congress but outside of current leadership?http://www.amazon.com/Young-Guns-Generation-Conservative-Leaders/dp/1451607342/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8=books=1284670201=8-1#reader_1451607342

Dustin Ingalls

And the most plausible alternatives (Cantor, Ryan, McCarthy) seem to be satisfied with their current leadership positions.I think the fact theyre co-authoring a book to be released just after the election shows theyre hungry to take power and take responsibility for the gains the GOP makes. If theyre satisfied, their rising public profiles arent jiving with that notion.And Boehner has done a lot to successfully secure a Republican house and support new candidates.Not really. Republicans have been entirely at the whim of their base, who have not supported a lot of the partys chosen candidates for either House or Senate seats. And any wins in the general election will be mostly due to the wave and turnout, which is more environmentally created than party-controlled.The speaker role is for a more moderate politician, anyways (Gingrich rather than Armey, Hastert rather than Delay). Conservatives should focus on the majority leader and the whip(s) and committee chairs rather than the speaker role.I can agree with that in principle, though in practicality, the Speaker is usually the party boss. There is no doubt Gingrich had more influence and power than any of his other party leaders; same for Pelosi when compared to Hoyer, Clyburn, etc.

Christian Liberty

Republicans will need to unite behind an alternate candidate. I dont see it happening. Boehner has shown he has a broad base of support in the house, even if he does not excite many. (Remember, Boehner was not the top choice on the first ballot -- Blunt 1st, Boehner 2nd, Shadegg 3rd. Boehner received most or all of Shadeggs votes, even though Shadegg would have been the conservative candidate.) Neither Blunt nor Shadegg will be in the house in 2011. And the most plausible alternatives (Cantor, Ryan, McCarthy) seem to be satisfied with their current leadership positions. And Boehner has done a lot to successfully secure a Republican house and support new candidates. I dont see who would run against Boehner.Boehner has been a solid opponent of earmarks, which is critical to reducing the arbitrary (and unaccountable) power and favoritism of the federal government. Boehner is probably an adequate conservative and an adequate tactical leader. More exciting conservatives can play a supporting role in leadership. The speaker role is for a more moderate politician, anyways (Gingrich rather than Armey, Hastert rather than Delay). Conservatives should focus on the majority leader and the whip(s) and committee chairs rather than the speaker role.


Christian proseltyzing and ranting in America are looking more like the Taliban every day. I dont want any religious based law. Its not necessary. Whats needed is a return to reason. The founders feared the tyranny of a minority as much as anything else. Spiritualism does not require a personal hands on manager(God). The universal laws of the universe are love and non violence.


First Anonymous,Remember, in that sense, liberty means the freedom to be exactly how they tell you that you can be and do what they tell you that you can do. United we stand, as long as we all stand exactly the same way.

Christian Liberty

To put it simply, government is the source of all tyranny and Christianity is the source of all liberty. There is no such thing as too much Christianity or too much liberty. Christianity is the source of all virtue that sustains liberty.

Christian Liberty

No, anonymous, it is exactly the opposite. Christianity is the source of all liberty. It is Christianity that inspires government to honor freedom of worship, separation of church and state (which protects the church from the government, not the other way around), innocence until guilt proven by due process, right to life and liberty and property, etc. Everything that is good comes from Christianity.


Isnt Christian Liberty an oxymoron? Kind of like Taliban Liberty.


Believing in a magic sky-father of any sort is one of the most persistent and damaging delusions in human history. Its entirely possible to create perfectly viable systems of morality that dont depend on an invisible, omniscient observer waiting to dispense punishment.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader