« | Main | »

March 23, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


As I bet Tom will confirm there is nothing amiss about Rasmussens surveys. In many cases, however, theyve been weighting Republicans heavier than other pollsters. They are one of the few pollsters that uses a Likely Voter screen. Some of the skew can be attributed to that. Rasmussens model ended up being spot on in New Jersey and Massachusetts. To dismiss Rasmussens polls out of hand behind because you dont like the result shows ignorance of polling. If Rasmussen continues to be right in their likely voter formula in upcoming special elections other pollsters will adjust their model. Determining the enthusiasm gap will be one of the big challenges for pollsters this year.


Its half a great answer. While WPRI is different, Rasmussen is Thompson +2, with a 4.5% margin of error. Given the PPP polls margin of error Rasmussen and PPP could be identical. The biggest difference in most polls has to do with weighting. PPP has given the Republicans less of an enthusiasm gap than some other pollsters. I believe PPP overweights Democrats and underweights Republicans. I believe a state that is 35% Democrat 32% Republican will vote 35% Republican 32% Democrat this year. Clearly Tom doesnt.Since Thompson isnt actually running I think we can give him a little flexibility here.


Rasmussen and WPRI are non-partisan? Au contraire. WPRI is run by a bunch of former Thompson staffers, and Rasmussen is a Republican firm.


Rasmussen non-partisan? You are good making me laugh :))The last months Rasmussen gives crazy numbers for very much states, and WI is one of their first targets (as are PA, IL, MI, CO or MN).But now I have not problem with Rasmussen polls because I decide ignore all they.One friend in Swing State Project call Rasmussen PINO (Pollster in name only). And he is just right.


Oh my god, just look up if they contributed to him on opensecrets.orgIts not THAT hard, is it?


I am a conservative but that is a great answer Tom

Tom Jensen

I really love being lectured on transparency by an anonymous commenter. Why dont you have the guts to post your name on your screeds and then maybe we can talk.


Another PPP poll conflicting with non-partisan polling. Every WPRI and Rasmussen poll has shown Thompson leading, with good favorable ratings. PPP is the only poll showing Thompson trailing, with negative(!) favorability.Doesnt pass the smell test.Has the management of PPP contributed to Feingolds campaign? Dooes PPP have a business relationship with Feingold?Full disclosure, please.

Christian Liberty

Rasmussen is one of the most accurate polls around. For leftists to try to PRETEND otherwise is just laughable.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2017

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.

WSJ Graphic


Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us




Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >


Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader