« Obama numbers steady | Main | »

October 07, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0133f2dd8001970b014e8802b681970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference School Board Polling:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Anonymous

It looks like Chris Fitzsimon at NC Policy Watch made a big mistake publishing his bigoted tirade against the winning school board candidates, before reading your Public Policy Poll. First, rather than address the issues and facts, Fitzsimon simply smeared the winning school board candidates, their supporters and voters, by calling the “resegrationist” who thought they had a “mandate for to return to separate and allegedly equal schools.” Fitzsimon complained that the “resegrationist” represented only “three percent” of the Wake County voters.Fitzsimon smear attack is readily refuted by simple math and facts. In reality, as your poll pointed out: “Overall 61% of voters opposed the policy with only 29% in support of it in that early September poll. Perhaps most telling 46% of African Americans were opposed to it with only 39% supportive.”So does Fitzsimon really thinks that 46% of African Americans are resegrationist, and only 29% support desegregation? Or will Fitzsimon admit that he is simply waging a vicious smear campaign by the playing the race card and calling the winning school board candidates and their supporters regregationist, even when those supporters include most African Americans?Can we not have an honest debate, and election campaigns, about school board issues, including school assignment policies, mandatory year round schools, school construction and the overall quality of education, without the Fitzsimon and the far left-wing calling the people they disagree, including the African Americans, racist?

Anonymous

Thanks for sharing the data. It confirms anecdotal comments I heard from my peers. It also confirms WCPSS administration & Board & Wake Ed. Partnership were into their Group Think mode and long ago stopped listening to their customers...the taxpayers. Hopefully the elections results shattered the Group Think mindset and they are now ready to tackle the real issues...Education for children at all ends of the spectrum - poor to rich, academically challenged to gifted -- without regards to their geographic location.I received two polling calls from your org. I am one of the Dems that voted for a Republican in District 9.

David Lee

Well now we know that Cathy Truitt or someone who has influence with her reads your blog/results! http://www.newsobserver.com/news/education/story/131520.html

Anonymous

How were the polling questions asked? Do Blacks know the real reason behind the diversity plan? If you ask people do they want kids to go to a school closer to their neighborhood, they will say yes. Its convenient! Polls are sometimes misleading. Especially if people dont have facts or data before answering. How quickly we forget The City of Raleigh Schools and Wake County Public School in the 70s...

Anonymous

I just want too take some time out thank the active members for doing what you do and make this community great im a long time reader and first time poster so i just wanted to say thanks.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2014

We came to PPP after a public poll in the San Jose Mayoral race showed our opponent ahead by 8 points. They found our candidate (Sam Liccardo) ahead by 3 points and that allowed us to be able to push back with the press against the perception that our opponent was now a strong favorite in the race. Sam ended up winning by 2 points and is now the next Mayor of San Jose. PPP worked very fast and had a very accurate read on the electorate when we needed them
–Eric Jaye, Storefront Political Media.

For more information on hiring PPP for your polling needs click here

Among the Best Pollsters, Year after Year.

2014 :
Rated Most Accurate Pollster in Governor’s Races Nationally

2012 :
Correctly predicted the winner of every state in the Presidential race, and the winner of every major Senate race

2010 :
First pollster to predict Scott Brown’s upset win over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race, only pollster to predict Christine O’Donnell’s upset victory over Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate primary.

2008 :
Ranked by the Wall Street Journal as the 2nd most accurate swing state pollster in the Presidential election.


WSJ Graphic

CONTACT US

Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us

RECENT POSTS

Categories

HIRE PPP

Dean Debnam Dean Debnam
Public Policy Polling CEO

PPP is best known for putting out highly accurate polling on key political races across the country, but we also do affordable private research for candidates and organizations.  Why pay tens of thousands of dollars for a survey when one of the most reliable companies in the nation can do it for less?"

Learn more about working
with PPP for your next project >

FOLLOW US

Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
RSS Feed RSS Reader
Email Sign up: New Polling Data email